July 25, 2018
Ray McLean

AMP: Different Organisation, Same Issue

When there has been a failure of leadership, the organisation must find a way to move forward. In the light of the banking royal commission, Ray McLean offers some suggestions for AMP.

I found it very interesting to see the take on the crisis facing AMP on the Four Corners episode, Money for Nothing, on 23 July.

Much of the episode was dedicated to outlining the litany of wrong-doing both legal, moral and cultural. I found myself trying to think of how?

Why?

And where to from here?

I may be guilty here of trying to simplify what was a systemic and deep-rooted problem. Clearly the simple answer is a total failure of leadership by the key executive team and board.

But what does that really mean?

Here are three key areas that stood out to me which, without address, will make it difficult for the organisation to move forward.

1. Lack of clarity of purpose

AMP started largely as a life insurer serving its clients / customers. At some point, the purpose (through executive behaviour and modelling) shifted to profit and share price. When the purpose of any team becomes confused or conflicted, there is a flow-on effect.

2. Behaviour

In a team or organisation where there is a lack of clarity of purpose and incongruent modelling by leaders, a gap widens between the behaviour / values the organisation espouses, and the unwritten or unspoken behaviour they come to accept.

3. Ability to challenge

When you embed a culture of wrong-doing, the most obvious behaviour which becomes ingrained is an inability for the team members / followers to raise questions or challenge the status quo. This is really where the term ‘whistleblower’ comes from. In simple terms, it is the person who sees questionable behaviour or practices and has no mechanism to raise their concerns. In a healthy team or organisation this should be standard practice.

Clearly AMP have had their share price decimated and their profit has been affected. I found the exposé on Four Corner interesting but as a shareholder and customer, I am much more interested in their response.

The easier option is to find a few scapegoats and get your brand and marketing team to begin the spin. The right option is to look for a courageous, principled team of leaders who are prepared to genuinely rebuild an organisation which has been left under-performing and tainted.

Leaders model the right behaviours. To discuss how your leaders behave, contact the office on 03 9654 3744.

 

Related Articles

News

That was a question I was asked by a very respected senior player during my first week working with an NRL club.  This player was a very reliable but under-rated, first-one-picked type of player. I had coached him at a previous club, and I noticed a shift in his demeanour.

News

Why healthy conflict is necessary for high-performing schools and leaders.

News

The summer break is almost here, and there’s no better time to consume a good book or podcast. Leading Teams turned 25 this year, so we’ve pulled together a curated list of 25 leadership books and podcasts recommended by the team at Leading Teams.

News

Last week Leading Team Australia celebrated our 25th year in business, a significant milestone.  Our model has been tested across all industries, team dynamics and with all types of leaders.  It got me thinking about how many businesses I have personally had the privilege of working with, in addition to the many clients stories and […]